翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Assessor macneilli
・ Assessor's parcel number
・ Asset
・ Asset (computer security)
・ Asset (disambiguation)
・ Asset (economics)
・ Asset (intelligence)
・ ASSET (spacecraft)
・ Asset Acceptance
・ Asset allocation
・ Asset and Content Management
・ Asset backed lending
・ Asset classes
・ Asset Description Metadata Schema
・ Asset Disposal and Information Security Alliance
Asset forfeiture
・ Asset freezing
・ Asset health management
・ Asset Homes
・ Asset Imanbayev
・ Asset integrity management systems
・ Asset Issekeshev
・ Asset liability management
・ Asset Liquidation Marketing Integration Within Asset Management Framework
・ Asset location
・ Asset lock
・ Asset Mambetov
・ Asset management
・ Asset management (social housing)
・ Asset Management Association of China


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Asset forfeiture : ウィキペディア英語版
Asset forfeiture

Asset forfeiture or asset seizure is a form of confiscation of assets by the state. It typically applies to the alleged proceeds or instruments of crime. This applies, but is not limited, to terrorist activities, drug related crimes, and other criminal and even civil offenses. Some jurisdictions specifically use the term "confiscation" instead of forfeiture. The purpose of asset forfeiture is to disrupt criminal activity by confiscating assets that potentially could have been beneficial to the individual or organization.
==Civil and criminal law==

Most legal systems distinguish between criminal and civil— and generally use separate courts, different procedures, and different evidentiary rules. The traditional view is that crimes are public wrongs—and that criminal law addresses those who harm society through morally culpable acts as a way to impose punishment and deter potential offenders from committing similar offenses. Criminal proceedings are therefore "officially designated ceremonies of guilt designation" and the label "criminal" carries with it a social stigma, which is not imposed on the losing party in a civil action. Because of this stigma and the potential punishment, which may be imposed by a criminal court, legal systems provide procedural protections above those available to a respondent in a civil case. For example, criminal proceedings require a higher standard of proof.
The bringing of civil proceedings is, by comparison, primarily the forum for a wronged private individual. Nevertheless this too is not an absolute position, as the state also may sue in the civil courts as a wronged individual, for example, in respect of a contractual dispute with a multinational company. Civil law does not aim to punish, but rather is designed to provide two types of remedy. First, it provides a remedy requiring a return to the way things were, the status quo ante, so as to restore the position of an injured party. Second, it provides a remedy to compensate an injured party for harm done to him.
While the traditional view of civil and criminal proceedings might be described as neighboring countries divided by a common border, this dichotomy is not as distinct as that metaphor might suggest. In recent years there has been a growing homogeneity between criminal and civil procedures. Criminal cases now often involve civil, or quasi-civil, procedures and some civil litigation has become quasi-criminal. Indeed it has been said that almost every attribute associated with the criminal law also appears in civil law and vice versa. This "significant disintegration of the wall between criminal and civil proceedings" has occurred on a number of fronts and is due, at least in part, to the fact that multiple strategies are now used to deal with crime. An early example was the use of injunctions to protect victims of domestic violence, even though, to obtain such an injunction, the plaintiff may be alleging the commission of a criminal assault. Rather than taking the traditional dichotomous perspective, recent legal proceedings might be better seen as a continuum, with distinctly civil proceedings at one end and clearly criminal proceedings at the other. Between the two ends of the continuum are a range of possibilities, each of which may be more or less criminal or civil.
Civil asset forfeiture has been harshly criticized by civil liberties advocates for its greatly reduced standards for conviction, reverse onus, and financial conflicts of interests arising when the law enforcement agencies who decide whether or not to seize assets stand to keep those assets for themselves.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Asset forfeiture」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.